Given the excessive partisanship in the United States today, I look for the opportunity to focus on points of agreement - there are many - instead of the constant barrage from all sides on points of disagreement.
It seems as though
The New York Times is a channel of the "progressive" political perspective.
I hoped the 07 June 2010 article by Patrick McGeehan,
Does Studying Economics Make You More Republican?, based on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York study
Is Economics Coursework, or Majoring in Economics, Associated with Different Civic Behaviors?, would raise another point of agreement.
Unfortunately as the Fed's study is being popularized by commentators, beginning with Mr.McGeehan, with characterizations of Republicans and Democrats leading to more divisiveness.
Our political discourse seems to be based on the model that one defines a caricature of the opposing perspective and then attacks the caricature in hopes of discrediting those who do not hold your position. This approach seems prevalent regardless of political perspective.
This is particularly frustrating given the fiscal irresponsibility of both major political parties.
While there is a difference in velocity, both political parties have been directing the country toward financial disaster through recklessly wasteful spending.
I am fortunate not to know any political ideologues personally (albeit some occasionally display such characteristics from time to time) which perhaps explains why I know no one who is presently satisfied with any political party. If my experience is representative, then why is our political environment so partisan?
No comments:
Post a Comment